But the codecs this adds support for are pretty rare in 2020 anyway.Īnd for whatever reason, app compatibility under Mavericks, while far from great, is much better than Mountain Lion. The one big advantage to Mountain Lion IMO is Perian compatibility-Mountain Lion's QuickTime used an extensible plugin system that allowed other programs (namely Perian) to add support for additional codecs, and Mavericks does not. It also wouldn't surprise me if they were actually working on (and focused on) Yosemite already, and just backported certain features and libraries to Mavericks to hit their yearly release cycle. Truth be told, there just isn't much different between the two releases-Apple was likely focused on getting iOS 7 out the door that year. It's possible the situation was different when Mavericks was new, but not in their final iterations. Both were extremely stable and predictable coming from Catalina, and the only performance difference was in memory-constrained situations, where Mavericks actually came out ahead of Mountain Lion due to the fact it can use memory compression. I could not find any compelling reason to use Mountain Lion over Mavericks. I'd officially decided I was fed up with modern macOS, and I was deciding which version to downgrade to as a daily driver. Click to expand.I did a lot of side-by-side testing of the final versions of Mountain Lion and Mavericks earlier this year inside of VMs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |